European Union Non-Discrimination Law

Introduction: 1. Dagmar Schiek with Victoria Chege: From EU Non-Discrimination Law towards Multidimensional Equality Law for Europe Part 1: Assessing Legal Responses to Multidimensional Equality 2. Ruth Nielsen: Is EU Equality Law Capable of Addressing Multiple and Intersectional Discrimination Yet? 3. Oddny Mjoell Arnadottir: Multidimensional Equality from Within - Themes from the European Convention of Human Rights 4. Sandra Fredman: Promoting Multi-Dimensional Equality: Positive Duties and Positive Rights Part 2: Theorising Intersectionality from Different Disciplinary Angles 5. Ulrike M. Vieten: Intersectionality Scope and Multidimensional Equality within the European Union: Traversing National Boundaries of Inequality? 6. Iyiola Solanke: Stigma: A limiting principle allowing multi-consciousness in anti-discrimination law? 7. Morag Goodwin: Multi-dimensional Identities and Socio- Economic Exclusion: The Case of the Roma 8. Michael Orton / Peter Ratcliffe: From single to multi-dimensional approaches to equalities: the example of contract compliance Part 3: Comparative Approaches to Multidimensional Equality Law in Europe 9. Kevaet Nousiainen: Utility based equality and disparate diversities - from a Finnish perspective 10. Susanne Burri / Sacha Prechal: Comparative Approaches to Gender Equality and Non-Discrimination in Europe 11. Kristina Koldinska: Multidimensional Equality in the Czech and Slovak Republics 12. Sylvaine Laulom: French Legal Approaches to Equality and Discrimination for Intersecting Grounds with a Focus on Labour Law 13. Hege Skjeie: Reorganising Institutions for Addressing Multiple Discrimination Part 4: A Symbol of Intersectionality in Legal Discourse - The Headscarf Enigma 14. Titia Loenen: The Headscarf Debate: Approaching the Intersection of Sex, Religion, and Race under the ECHR and EC Equality Law 15. Lynn Roseberry: Religion, Race, Ethnicity and Gender in the Danish Headscarf Debate 16. Ute Sacksofsky: Religion and Equality in Germany - the Headscarf Debate from a "Constitutional Perspective"