God Without Thunder

"God Without Thunder, an Unorthodox Defense of Orthodoxy" is a provocative and profound exploration of the relationship between religion, science, and the modern world. Written by the distinguished poet and critic John Crowe Ransom, this work offers a sharp critique of how contemporary thought has sanitized the concept of the divine. Ransom argues that the modern God-conceived as a purely benevolent, scientific, and rational force-has been stripped of the awe and thunder that defined traditional orthodoxy.

In this intellectual defense of faith, he advocates for a return to a more robust, mythical understanding of religion, asserting that the scientific worldview alone cannot provide the moral or spiritual depth necessary for human life. By examining the roles of myth and ritual, Ransom challenges the encroachment of secular rationalism and calls for a re-evaluation of the supernatural in an increasingly disenchanted age. "God Without Thunder, an Unorthodox Defense of Orthodoxy" remains a significant contribution to the intellectual history of the early twentieth century, reflecting the enduring tensions between tradition and progress that continue to resonate in theological and philosophical discourse.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you may see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.