What Proust Heard

Reviews / Votes

"What Proust Heard is the work of a scholar at the peak of his powers. Lucey offers an entirely new reading of Proust. This book helps us understand what novels-particularly Proust's extraordinary novel of novels-can do to register and create social worlds. The result is a new genre of literary criticism that helps us understand how and why we experience reading (of all things) as a conversation outside our own heads." * Virginia Jackson, University of California, Irvine * "Michael Lucey, an essayist esteemed for ground-breaking work on Balzac, Gide, Proust, and Colette, has opened up the world of literary criticism once again, this time through a rigorous investigation of the field of linguistic anthropology. That in itself is news. But the real achievement here is the way his synthesis of the two fields enables him to analyze the use of conversation in fiction, in authors with very different styles and intentions: Proust, Sarraute, and brilliantly, Rachel Cusk. I'll never read or hear any of them the same way again." * Alice Kaplan, Yale University * "From the formal patterns of Vinteuil's musical compositions to the cries of the Paris street traders, what Proust heard and what with him the reader of A la recherche du temps perdu encounters, is one of the richest sound worlds of fiction since Rabelais. Above all there are the multiple registers of human speech, to the analysis of which Michel Lucey brings the conceptual tools of sociology and anthropology in the elaboration of what he calls an 'ethnography of talk'. His account is a veritable tour de force in its mix of theoretical sophistication and close-up auditory attentiveness. It is a major contribution to our understanding of Proust's great novel and more generally of the functioning of the novel as a literary genre. It is, in short, indispensable listening matter." * Christopher Prendergast, University of Cambridge * "It is this Proust-the listener more than the dreamer-who interests Michael Lucey. The Proust Lucey evokes in What Proust Heard is a certain type of listener, someone who attends not only to words but also to how words function in particular interactions - what Lucey calls 'language-in-use.'" * Los Angeles Review of Books * "Readers of What Proust Heard will not only learn many fine-grained, incisive ways of speaking about speaking - social indexicality, meta-pragmatics, register shibboleths, footing - but stand to reconceive what it means to speak - 'the work that talk does' - both in novels and in the world." * L'Esprit Createur * "The Proust that emerges in What Proust Heard is exquisitely attentive to talk: what is said, how it is said, and what that indicates about social structures. Lucey deftly weaves close readings from In Search of Lost Time with insights drawn from linguistic anthropologist Michael Silverstein and sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, among many others, to convincingly demonstrate that the linguistic anthropological and sociological aspects of Proust are essential to understanding his novel's structure." * Studies in the Novel *