The Geopolitics of Spectacle

Reviews / Votes

With its accessible writing style and lively anecdotal interludes, The Geopolitics of Spectacle invites critical thinking about the often alluded to, yet seldom critically assessed, discourse of the 'theatrical' or 'false modernity' of Asian cities in popular Western media. Reading Koch's book will therefore not only teach us much about political geography, but will also train us to overcome 'intellectual laziness' and become critically informed spectators of some of the world's fastest emerging cities.

(LSE Review of Books) A thoughtful study in political geography.

(Journal of Peace Research) Provides [a] compelling vision of what urban practices can do politically. [Koch] brings years of fieldwork experience and regional expertise that make the book [a] strong contribution to... political geography as well as urban studies more broadly. [Her] theoretical findings are deployable in contexts beyond Asia and MENA and [is] a welcome addition to the growing political geographic literature on urbanization.

(Geopolitics) While theoretically rich, Geopolitics of Spectacle is at the same time written in a skilful and accessible way. It is an important contribution to the fields of human geography, political studies and anthropology. Koch's monograph is an inspiring work, worth recommending to scholars interested in a wide range of topics: from urban studies, broadly defined post-Soviet studies or area studies to governmentality and citizenship.

(Inner Asia) The Geopolitics of Spectacle is an interesting piece or writing, in itself a detournement through difficult to access spaces and places, as well as its more shiny and dramatic foci. Well structured and with a strong narrative drive, the reader will certainly consider boarding train 84 for that long ride from Kazanski station to Astana Nurly Jol... This reviewer will certainly pay this book a second visit.

(Eurasian Geography and Economics) The Geopolitics of Spectacle is an essential contribution to multidisciplinary fields that deal with global dynamics of urbanization, authoritarianism in urban politics, nation-building and identity politics, and the geographies of megaprojects. A work that is essential for the researcher, it is also highly readable, concise, and timely; an ideal text for graduate and undergraduate courses.

(Journal of Urban Affairs) Koch's book provides a refreshingly concrete theoretical framework for understanding spectacle in a non-Western, non-democratic context... The book is further innovative in its methodological approach, which directly tackles the shortcomings of conventional area-based analyses fixated on commonalities across case studies, rather than their divergences. By making a case for divergent-case comparisons, Koch is able to break away from the all-too-often default comparison of Central Asia with its former Soviet counterparts, a comparison that may not always be the most relevant. By widening our understanding of suitable cases for comparison, the book opens new channels for framing Central Asian research in other disciplines.

(Central Asian Affairs) In essence, the work scores on account of being novel both in theme and approach. Its objectives are clearly defined and the author has been successful in meeting these. The treatise is thoughtfully conceived, soundly researched, well-argued and lucidly expressed. More important, it looks beyond established stereotypes and includes voices from the margins, not just in the choice of case studies but within the case studies as well. The work locates itself at a research frontier and deserves to be commended equally for its perspective, approach, and methodology.

(Social & Cultural Geography) [The Geopolitics of Spectacle] provide[s] critical accounts of Astana as a symbol of Kazakhstan's modernity and use[s] the experience of people who work in and outside Astana to substantiate that critique.

(Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History)