How to Read Karl Barth

Reviews / Votes

`It is often a work of art in itself, with a texture and depth as richly nuanced as the gallery it depicts ... Nothing less than luminous.'
First Things `Brings a thoroughness and carefulness to the daunting work of Barth interpretation ... He admirably and aptly accounts for the complexity and richness of Barth.'
Journal of Religion `Hunsinger ... now gives us something salutary and timely: a solid scholarly overview of Barth doing what Barth does best - dogmatic theology - and what the church especially needs today.'
Commonwealth `A quite splendid and original book to be read and re-read by those who want to understand Barth.'
Expository Times `This is the most helpful way into studying Barth's Church Dogmatics that I know ... a book which shows theological passion and a sharp discernment about what especially needs to be retrieved from Barth.'
David F. Ford, Journal of Theological Studies, Vol. 44, No. 1, April 1993 'Throughout the book we see the theological energy, seriousness and creativity of Barth as he wrestles with all sorts of questions which remain fundamental for Christian theology today. It provokes and enables critical conversation with Barth, and thus achieves its major aim.'
Brian Marshall, Westminster College, Oxford, The Modern Churchman 'at last, George Hunsinger has provided me, and many others I expect, with an answer. His How to Read Karl Barth is an excellent primer and a good deal more besides...How to read Karl Barth has much to commend it. As an introduction to Barth's Church Dogmatics, it will take some beating...'
Reviews in Religion and Theology ' ... may usefully serve as a framework for exploring and predicting in an extrapolative way the shape of Barth's thought. Those who for one reason or another find themselves less congenially disposed towards the content of Barth's theology should, nonetheless, take the time and the trouble to benefit from the sheer erudition and the impressive familiarity with the text of the Church Dogmatics which lies behind this book, and which makes it one of the most helpful contributions to Barth scholarship for some considerable time. Those with a serious interest in Barth's theology who have not yet obtained and read it should certainly do so,'
Trevor Hart, Aberdeen Scotland. EuroJTh (1994) The thesis proposed by McCormack is very attractive indeed. The author has gathered sufficient evidence for the early writings of Barth to substantiate his arguments. The breadth of the author's reading is evident throughout, and this reviewer looks forward to the second instalment. * Roland Chia, Theology, May '96 *