The China Question

Reviews / Votes

'The China Question belongs on the shelf with classics by Jonathan Spence and Harold Isaacs. Western views of China have oscillated between 'Contempt and naive idealization.' Social science research has brought empirical data to our understanding of China, but Orientalism still exerts powerful sway over policy and academic discourse.' David M. Lampton, author of Living U.S.-China Relations 'The China Question provides a fascinating tour d'horizon of changing images of China, foreign and domestic, from medieval days to the present. Based on wide research and deep reflection, historical sociologist Ho-fung Hung has written an accessible and eye-opening account suitable for the general public and academic community alike.' Elizabeth Perry, author of Anyuan: Mining China's Revolutionary Tradition 'Western understandings of China have for many centuries tended to polarize between Sinophobia and Sinophilia. Hung furnishes a fascinating and persuasive account of how this Orientalist duality not only pervaded Western Sinology both on the left and the right, but also led to the 'self-orientalization' by Chinese intellectuals and the state.' Prasenjit Duara, author of The Crisis of Global Modernity: Asian Traditions and a Sustainable Future 'China's rich 4,000 history has always fascinated Westerners. Yet rarely have they approached that history objectively. Instead, China has been simplified, magnified, or distorted to stand for the 'anti-West.' Hung's magnificent survey shows how China has been, at various times, lauded as a model for art and governance and decried as a stagnant or threatening despotism. Hung's book sifts truths from falsehoods and gives us a much better understanding of China and of ourselves.' Jack A. Goldstone, author of Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World 'Ho-fung Hung has crafted a comprehensive, detailed and nuanced investigation into the many forms of knowledge about 'China' that appeared in Europe and later North America since the era of the Mongol invasions in the thirteenth century. European scholarship experienced several cycles of sinophilia and sinophobia over the centuries. Hung's argument is at its most compelling when it pinpoints the ways in which Chinese scholars and politicians appropriated orientalist views of China into their own state-building discourses and projects. In this way, he highlights how exceptionalist arguments continue to be mobilized today both within and outside China in support of authoritarian rule.' Sebastian Veg, author of Minjian: The Rise of China's Grassroots Intellectuals