Interpretation

Reviews / Votes

'Aner Govrin is one of the most scholarly psychoanalytic thinkers of our time. In this contemporary critique of the cornerstone of clinical technique, he explores and dissects the many varied interpretations of interpretation itself. Whether as conviction or hubris, epistemological certainty or humility, Govrin casts new critical insight on the very nature of psychoanalytic hermeneutics. This should be mandatory reading for anyone in the field.'

Prof. Jon Mills, author of End of the World: Civilization and Its Fate

'I wish Aner Govrin's little book on interpretation had been available to me when I was a graduate student and a candidate. And now, too, I am glad to have it. Interpretation intrigues us from the very beginning of our work as psychotherapists, and we never outgrow that sense of wonder, because to study interpretation is to study the birth of meaning. Our fascination with the topic is well served by the kind of fair minded, comparative consideration Govrin gives it. He offers an overview of how interpretation has been conceptualized in the various psychoanalytic traditions; and then, in his excellent final chapter and his afterword, he leads the reader into current controversies and new ideas about interpretation. I know I will recommend this small gem to both students and contemporaries, because its straightforward examination of mysteries will relieve them, on one hand, and encourage their appreciation of the marvels of our work, on the other.'

Donnel B. Stern, Ph.D., William Alanson White Institute

'Aner Govrin's, Interpretation: A Contemporary Introduction, offers an important discussion about this central psychoanalytic concept. As psychoanalysis changes, there are many competing definitions about what interpretation is and how it works, and Govrin rightly points out that they are in need of exploration. He takes us through Freud's idea of interpretation, through the Kleinian development of interpretations of the pre-verbal world of the infant, and includes Betty Joseph's subsequent shift of emphasis from interpretations of the content, to the process between analyst and analysand. He explores Winnicott, as well as Bion's many revolutionary theoretical and clinical ideas, and other contemporary work that provides an overview of how ideas about interpretation have changed. While Freud's and Breuer's so-called "talking cure" was about verbal interpretation, we see here that as psychoanalysis continues to evolve, there are mysteries in silence to which analysts also need to attend, and interpret. This is a well-needed discussion, and the profound questions that Govrin explores are not easily resolved. He wisely states that his book is "an invitation to join an on-going conversation." Those who accept that invitation will be rewarded by new questions and new thoughts about this fundamental aspect of analytic work.'

Annie Reiner, Ph.D., Psy.D., LCSW. Member and senior training analyst, Psychoanalytic Center of California (PCC)