Choreomania

Reviews / Votes

[...] what Gotman accomplishes in the process is a daring negotiation with the history of 'movement', one that persuades her readers to imagine the possibilities inherent in the sight of bodies dancing beyond the rigid confines of the ordinary - outside, perhaps, the onward march of late capitalism - and into states of dissent, disruption, and ecstatic disorder. * Megan Girdwood, The Cambridge Quarterly * choreomania encourages broader notions of how discourse on dance is produced and reproduced in order to better understand dance's political and social potential. * Tessa Nun, Comparative Literature Studies * Choreomania is as progressive in its historical methodologies as it is in its provocative analyses of heretofore undertheorized modes of movement, dance and gesture. I have no doubt that it will deeply impact dance and performance studies as a pathbreaking analysis of social bodies in motion as well as an inspiring example of how the durable roots of rigorous critical and historical methodologies strengthen scholarship that stretches so far across geography and time. * Rebecca Chaleff, Theatre Research International * [Choreomania] is a significant contribution to theatre and performance studies methodologies, advancing a historiographical method that attends to movement, motility, kinetics, dynamics, efforts, push, and pull...It is exciting to imagine what new research Choreomania will make possible. * Broderick D. V. Chow, Royal Central School of Speech & Drama, Contemporary Theatre Review * Choreomania is consistently enlightening and Provocative. * Megan Girdwood, Cambridge Quarterly *