Fact Finding in Civil Proceedings
A Comparative Analysis of the Roles of Judges, Lawyers and Litigants
Published on 22. April 2024
Book
Paperback/Softback
182 pages
978-94-6212-923-8 (ISBN)
Unfortunately, price unknown
Available (delivery time upon request)
Not available
Description
Spring Meeting of the Dutch Procedural Law Association 2024
On Friday June 21st 2024, the Spring Meeting of the Dutch Procedural Law Association (NVvP) will take place, with the topic 'Fact-finding in Civil Procedures'.
Distinguished Speakers
The speakers will be: Judge C.J-A. Seinen (Judge at the District Court of The Hague and PhD candidate in Civil Law at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam); Prof. C. Gomille (Professor of Civil Law, European and International Private Law and Civil Procedure at the University of Saarland); Prof. W. Vandenbussche (Professor of Civil Procedure at the University of Ghent); Prof. F. Rouvière (Professor of Civil Law and Criminal Sciences at the Université d'Aix-Marseille).
Country Reports and Comparative Themes
In anticipation of the meeting on June 21st 2024, this part in the series of NVvP publications contains the country reports with a comparative analysis on four subtopics: 1. The extensiveness of the document starting the proceedings. 2. Does a form of nemo tenetur apply in civil law? 3. The role of the judge in fact-gathering. 4. Is there a duty to tell the truth; if so: is it upheld?
On Friday June 21st 2024, the Spring Meeting of the Dutch Procedural Law Association (NVvP) will take place, with the topic 'Fact-finding in Civil Procedures'.
Distinguished Speakers
The speakers will be: Judge C.J-A. Seinen (Judge at the District Court of The Hague and PhD candidate in Civil Law at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam); Prof. C. Gomille (Professor of Civil Law, European and International Private Law and Civil Procedure at the University of Saarland); Prof. W. Vandenbussche (Professor of Civil Procedure at the University of Ghent); Prof. F. Rouvière (Professor of Civil Law and Criminal Sciences at the Université d'Aix-Marseille).
Country Reports and Comparative Themes
In anticipation of the meeting on June 21st 2024, this part in the series of NVvP publications contains the country reports with a comparative analysis on four subtopics: 1. The extensiveness of the document starting the proceedings. 2. Does a form of nemo tenetur apply in civil law? 3. The role of the judge in fact-gathering. 4. Is there a duty to tell the truth; if so: is it upheld?
More details
Content
Fact-finding: Must Parties Tell The Truth (and/or Must The Judge Seek It)?; Truth in the Context of Dutch Procedural Law; Does a Form of Nemo Tenetur Apply in Civil Law?; Nemo Tenetur in Civil Law: A Tale of Two Sides of a Coin; The Role of the Right to a Fair Trial in an Era of Social Polarisation; The Document Initiating the Proceedings: Requirements and Role in the Fact-finding Process; Dutch Obligations to Provide Comprehensive Information; The Role of the Judge in Fact-finding; The European Championship of Judicial Fact-finding; Report on the Spring Meeting of 21 June 2024 of The Dutch Association for Procedural Law; Procesrechtelijke reeks NVVP;