Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases
Published on 30. March 2017
Book
Hardback
296 pages
978-1-107-18377-3 (ISBN)
Description
Traditionally, courts adjudicate fundamental rights cases by applying substantive tests of reasonableness or proportionality. Increasingly, however, European courts are also expressly taking account of the quality of the procedure that has led up to a fundamental rights interference. Yet this procedural review is far from uncontroversial. There still is a lack of clarity as to what 'procedural review' really means, what its potential for judicial decision-making is, how it relates and should relate to substantive review, and what its limitations are. Featuring contributions from experts in the field, this book is the first in-depth study into procedural review, considering the theoretical and conceptual issues at play, as well as the applicability of procedural review in different legal systems. It will therefore be of great importance to scholars and practitioners interested in fundamental rights adjudication in Europe, judicial reasoning and procedural justice.
More details
Language
English
Place of publication
Cambridge
United Kingdom
Target group
Professional and scholarly
Illustrations
Worked examples or Exercises
Dimensions
Height: 235 mm
Width: 157 mm
Thickness: 21 mm
Weight
582 gr
ISBN-13
978-1-107-18377-3 (9781107183773)
Copyright in bibliographic data and cover images is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited or by the publishers or by their respective licensors: all rights reserved.
Schweitzer Classification
Other editions
Additional editions
Janneke Gerards | Eva Brems
Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases
Book
08/2018
Cambridge University Press
€49.10
Shipment within 15-20 days
Janneke Gerards
Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases
E-Book
03/2017
Cambridge University Press
€21.99
Available for download
Janneke Gerards | Eva Brems
Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases
E-Book
03/2017
Cambridge University Press
€26.49
Available for download
Persons
Janneke Gerards is a Professor of Fundamental Rights Law at Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands. Her research focuses on European fundamental rights, judicial review and constitutional law. She is also a deputy Judge in the Appeals Court of The Hague, a member of the Human Rights Commission of the Netherlands Advisory Council on International Affairs, and a member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Eva Brems is a Professor of Human Rights Law at Universiteit Gent, Belgium. She has published widely in many areas of human rights law, in particular on the European Convention on Human Rights. She is a European Research Council Starting Grant Laureate and a member of the executive committee of the International Association of Constitutional Law.
Content
1. Introduction Janneke Gerards and Eva Brems; Part I. Foundations and Rationales for Procedural Review by Supranational Courts Deciding Fundamental Rights Cases: 2. The 'logics' of procedural-type review by the European Court of Human Rights Eva Brems; 3. The modest promise of 'procedural review' in fundamental rights cases Aruna Sathanapally; Part II. The (Potential) Value of Procedural Review for Supranational Courts Deciding Fundamental Rights Cases - Political Science Perspectives: 4. Evidence based lawmaking: influences, obstacles and the role of the European Court of Human Rights Patricia Popelier; 5. Responsiveness towards fundamental rights impacts in the preparation of EU legislation Fay Kartner and Anne Meuwese; Part III. Application of Procedural Review - Comparative Perspectives: 6. Procedural review by the European Court of Human Rights - a typology: 7. Procedural review by the European Court of Human Rights - view from the Court Angelika Nussberger; 8. Procedural fundamental rights review by the Court of Justice of the European Union Malu Beijer; 9. Procedural review in WTO law Isabelle Van Damme; 10. Process and substance in judicial review in the United Kingdom and at Strasbourg: proportionality, subsidiarity, complementarity? Roger Masterman.