Power without Knowledge

Reviews / Votes

Recommended. * D. Bantz, University of Alaska, CHOICE * an intellectual and scholarly tour de force: impressively wide-ranging, refreshingly iconoclastic, and consistently interesting. * Eric MacGilvray, Ohio State University * Power without Knowledge gives us a provocative and moving evocation of how those ideals undercut technocracy from within. Friedman does not reject the technocratic dedication to the relief of human suffering. But he shows that we should not assume that those who suffer are so homogeneous that they must succumb to positivist methods of behavioral prediction. * Paul Gunn, University of London, The Review of Politics * This is just the book for social scientists still in thrall to the capacity of technocratic elites to bring the utopian ideas of political philosophers to the people by virtue of their instrumental skills. Friedman's critique will remove the scales from your eyes. The improvement of society may be possible but it will never emerge from the cost-benefit analyses of what he calls the Epistocrats. Densely and convincingly argued, lucidly written, Power without Knowledge is perhaps the most convincing case yet against the worship of classical economics in political life. * James C. Scott, Sterling Professor of Political Science and Anthropology, Yale University * Combining political philosophy, empirical studies of public opinion, and psychology, Jeffrey Friedman provides a brilliant and multi-faceted analysis of political epistemology. The question of how people judge the efficacy of alternative policies raises crucial questions for democracy, and by building on the century-old debates between Walter Lippmann and John Dewey, Friedman takes us deep into current predicaments of governance. * Robert Jervis, Adlai E. Stevenson Professor of International Politics, Columbia University, and author of How Statesmen Think * A creative effort to fuse political philosophy, epistemology, and cognitive science and rescue us from our current political predicament: closed-minded partisans locked in tight alliances with over-confident likeminded experts. This book is loaded with profoundly important arguments that I have never seen brought together so skillfully. * Philip E. Tetlock, Annenberg University Professor, University of Pennsylvania; author of Expert Political Judgment * Today, many embrace their own 'alternative facts,' but Jeffrey Friedman contends that we still all too often believe our preferred experts can guide human behavior to good results-when we should doubt that any know how to do so. The bold alternative he raises is to seek to provide people with the resources needed to make their own choices. While so many today claim to champion 'the people,' Friedman seeks instead to help people champion themselves. * Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania * Friedman offers a powerful critique of technocratic politics. He marvelously pricks the hubris of social scientists with their naive epistemologies and their claims to predictive powers. And he provides an invigorating call for greater freedom and experimentation with a basis in universal welfare. * Mark Bevir, University of California, Berkeley * In this deeply learned, passionately argued book, Jeffrey Friedman offers a trenchant critique of technocracy that indicts both the epistocratic 'rule of experts' and the opinion-based policy produced by democratic collectives. Rejecting the idea that either experts or ordinary citizens are capable of attaining the knowledge necessary to solve the social problems of modernity, he urges that the choice of individual exit is epistemically superior to voice and offers 'exitocracy' as a radical alternative to existing forms of government. His bold, carefully reasoned argument challenges social theorists to rethink our most cherished assumptions about the potential of public policy to foster ameliorative change. * Josiah Ober, Stanford University *