
Collected Works of Erasmus
Controversies, Volume 80-81
Desiderius Erasmus(Author)
Edwin Rabbie(Editor)
University of Toronto Press
Will be published approx. on 10. November 2026
Book
Hardback
912 pages
978-1-0498-0567-2 (ISBN)
Description
When a Parisian publisher in 1523 intended to reprint one of Erasmus's popular paraphrases on the New Testament, he was forced to submit the work to the members of the theological faculty of the University of Paris. The influential syndic of the faculty, Noel Beda, took charge of the censorship and detected numerous unorthodox elements, particularly Lutheran tendencies.
Beda was so shocked by what he had read that he extended his research to all the other paraphrases of Erasmus on the New Testament that he could get his hands on. In the following years, Erasmus attempted to prevent Beda from publishing his findings and to steer clear from a condemnation of his books by the Parisian theologians. He failed in both respects, despite the five polemical writings presented here in volumes 80 and 81 for the first time in translation , in which he attempted to refute Beda's objections.
The mutual insurmountable incomprehension between the two scholars - exemplary of the contrast between scholastic and humanist approaches to the Bible in the early sixteenth century - is the common thread in this fierce and at times unsavoury quarrel.
Beda was so shocked by what he had read that he extended his research to all the other paraphrases of Erasmus on the New Testament that he could get his hands on. In the following years, Erasmus attempted to prevent Beda from publishing his findings and to steer clear from a condemnation of his books by the Parisian theologians. He failed in both respects, despite the five polemical writings presented here in volumes 80 and 81 for the first time in translation , in which he attempted to refute Beda's objections.
The mutual insurmountable incomprehension between the two scholars - exemplary of the contrast between scholastic and humanist approaches to the Bible in the early sixteenth century - is the common thread in this fierce and at times unsavoury quarrel.
More details
Series
Language
English
Place of publication
Toronto
Canada
Target group
College/higher education
Professional and scholarly
Illustrations
6 illustrations
Dimensions
Height: 248 mm
Width: 171 mm
Weight
1 gr
ISBN-13
978-1-0498-0567-2 (9781049805672)
Copyright in bibliographic data and cover images is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited or by the publishers or by their respective licensors: all rights reserved.
Schweitzer Classification
Persons
Desiderius Erasmus (c. 1466-1536), a Dutch humanist, Catholic priest, and scholar, was one of the most influential Renaissance figures. A professor of divinity and Greek, Erasmus wrote, taught, and travelled, meeting with Europe's foremost scholars. Erasmus was a prolific author, writing on both ecclesiastic and general human interest subjects.
Edwin Rabbie is a judge at the criminal law division of the District Court of The Hague, Netherlands. He has contributed to several volumes of the Amsterdam edition of Erasmus' Opera omnia and has published on neo-Latin literature.
Edwin Rabbie is a judge at the criminal law division of the District Court of The Hague, Netherlands. He has contributed to several volumes of the Amsterdam edition of Erasmus' Opera omnia and has published on neo-Latin literature.
Content
Introduction
Edwin Rabbie
Editor's Note
Acknowledgments
User Instructions
1. The Prologue to the Computation of the False Accusations of Noel Beda: Prologus Erasmi Roterodami in Supputationem calumniarum Natalis Bedae
2. Guesses Concerning Passages Censured by Beda on Erasmus's Paraphrase on Matthew and Firstly on the Two Preceding Letters: Divinationes ad Notata per Bedam de Paraphrasi Erasmi in Matthaeum et primo de duabus praemissis Epistolis
3. Refutation of Noel Beda's Censures: In Natalis Bedae Censuras Elenchus
4. Computations of the Errors in Noel Beda's Censures: Supputationes errorum in Censuris Natalis Bedae
5. A Response to Beda's Little Notes: Responsio ad notulas Bedaicas
Works Frequently Cited
Short-title Forms for Erasmus's Works
Index
Edwin Rabbie
Editor's Note
Acknowledgments
User Instructions
1. The Prologue to the Computation of the False Accusations of Noel Beda: Prologus Erasmi Roterodami in Supputationem calumniarum Natalis Bedae
2. Guesses Concerning Passages Censured by Beda on Erasmus's Paraphrase on Matthew and Firstly on the Two Preceding Letters: Divinationes ad Notata per Bedam de Paraphrasi Erasmi in Matthaeum et primo de duabus praemissis Epistolis
3. Refutation of Noel Beda's Censures: In Natalis Bedae Censuras Elenchus
4. Computations of the Errors in Noel Beda's Censures: Supputationes errorum in Censuris Natalis Bedae
5. A Response to Beda's Little Notes: Responsio ad notulas Bedaicas
Works Frequently Cited
Short-title Forms for Erasmus's Works
Index