Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology
A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks of Selected Countries and the EU
Published on 29. August 2019
Book
Hardback
XI, 372 pages
978-3-030-17118-6 (ISBN)
Description
This book provides in-depth insights into the regulatory frameworks of five countries and the EU concerning the regulation of genome edited plants. The country reports form the basis for a comparative analysis of the various national regulations governing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in general and genome edited plants in particular, as well as the underlying regulatory approaches.The reports, which focus on the regulatory status quo of genome edited plants in Argentina, Australia, Canada, the EU, Japan and the USA, were written by distinguished experts following a uniform structure. On this basis, the legal frameworks are compared in order to foster a rational assessment of which approaches could be drawn upon to adjust, or to completely realign, the current EU regime for GMOs. In addition, a separate chapter identifies potential best practices for the regulation of plants derived from genome editing.
More details
Edition
2019 ed.
Language
English
Place of publication
Cham
Switzerland
Publishing group
Springer International Publishing
Target group
Professional and scholarly
Illustrations
15 s/w Abbildungen, 19 farbige Abbildungen
XI, 372 p. 34 illus., 19 illus. in color.
Dimensions
Height: 241 mm
Width: 160 mm
Thickness: 27 mm
Weight
740 gr
ISBN-13
978-3-030-17118-6 (9783030171186)
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3
Schweitzer Classification
Other editions
Additional editions
Hans-Georg Dederer | David Hamburger
Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology
A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks of Selected Countries and the EU
Book
08/2020
Springer
€181.89
Shipment within 7-9 days
Hans-Georg Dederer | David Hamburger
Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology
A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks of Selected Countries and the EU
E-Book
08/2019
1st Edition
Springer
€171.19
Available for download
Persons
Hans-Georg Dederer
is full professor of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Public International Law, European and International Economic Law at the University of Passau (Germany). His fields of research include international environmental law and agricultural biotechnology law. He is also a member of the Permanent Senate Commission on Genetic Research of the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft - DFG)
David Hamburger is a Ph.D. candidate at the Chair of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Public International Law, European and International Economic Law at the University of Passau (Germany) and holds a LL.M. degree from the University of Glasgow. As part of a project funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), he is conducting research on the international aspects of the regulation of plants derived from genome editing.
David Hamburger is a Ph.D. candidate at the Chair of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Public International Law, European and International Economic Law at the University of Passau (Germany) and holds a LL.M. degree from the University of Glasgow. As part of a project funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), he is conducting research on the international aspects of the regulation of plants derived from genome editing.
Content
FM.- Introduction: Regulation of plants derived from genome editing - What Lessons to be learned from other countries?.- Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: Argentina.- Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: Australia.- Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: Canada.- Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: European Union.- Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: Japan.- Genetic Engineering in the United States: Regulation of crops and their food products.- Comparative Analysis: The Regulation of Plants Derived from Genome Editing in Argentina, Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan and the United States.- Appendix.