
Paying For Performance in Healthcare: Implications for Health System Performance and Accountability
Implications for health system performance and accountability
Open University Press
Published on 16. September 2014
Book
Paperback/Softback
336 pages
978-0-335-26438-4 (ISBN)
Description
Health spending continues to grow faster than the economy in most OECD countries. In 2010, the OECD published a study of strategies to increase value for money in health care, in which pay for performance (P4P) was identified as an innovative tool to improve health system efficiency in several OECD countries.However, evidence that P4P increases value for money, boosts quality of processes in health care, or improves health outcomes is limited.This book explores the many questions surrounding P4P such as whether the potential power of P4P has been over-sold, or whether the disappointing results to date are more likely rooted in problems of design and implementation or inadequate monitoring and evaluation. The book also examines the supporting systems and process, in addition to incentives, that are necessary for P4P to improve provider performance and to drive and sustain improvement.The book utilises a substantial set of case studies from 12 OECD countries to shed light on P4P programs in practice.Featuring both high and middle income countries, cases from primary and acute care settings, and a range of both national and pilot programmes, each case study features:
Analysis of the design and implementationdecisions, including the role of stakeholders Critical assessment of objectives versus results Examination of the of 'net' impacts, includingpositive spillover effects and unintended consequences
The detailed analysis of these 12 case studies together with the rest of this critical text highlight the realities of P4P programs and their potential impact on the performance of health systems in a diversity of settings. As a result, this book provides critical insights into the experience to date with P4P and how this tool may be better leveraged to improve health system performance and accountability.This title is in the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series.
Analysis of the design and implementationdecisions, including the role of stakeholders Critical assessment of objectives versus results Examination of the of 'net' impacts, includingpositive spillover effects and unintended consequences
The detailed analysis of these 12 case studies together with the rest of this critical text highlight the realities of P4P programs and their potential impact on the performance of health systems in a diversity of settings. As a result, this book provides critical insights into the experience to date with P4P and how this tool may be better leveraged to improve health system performance and accountability.This title is in the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series.
More details
Language
English
Place of publication
Milton Keynes
United Kingdom
Target group
Professional and scholarly
Dimensions
Height: 231 mm
Width: 154 mm
Thickness: 21 mm
Weight
498 gr
ISBN-13
978-0-335-26438-4 (9780335264384)
Schweitzer Classification
Other editions
Additional editions

Cheryl Cashin | Y-Ling Chi | Michael Borowitz
Paying For Performance In Healthcare
Implications For Health System Performance And Accountability
E-Book
09/2014
1st Edition
Open University Press
€46.80
Available for download
Persons
Dr. Cheryl Cashin, Results for Development Institute Ms. Y-Ling Chi, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
Dr. Peter Smith, Imperial College London and the Centre for Health Policy in the Institute of Global Health Innovation
Dr. Michael Borowitz, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
Dr. Sarah Thomson, WHO Regional Office for Europe, London School of Economics and Political Science and European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
Dr. Peter Smith, Imperial College London and the Centre for Health Policy in the Institute of Global Health Innovation
Dr. Michael Borowitz, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
Dr. Sarah Thomson, WHO Regional Office for Europe, London School of Economics and Political Science and European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
Content
List of tables, figures and boxes
List of contributors
Foreword from the OECD
Foreword from CNAMTS
Acknowledgements
List of abbreviations Part I An overview of health provider P4P in OECD countries
Health provider P4P and strategic healthpurchasing
P4P programme design
Strengthening health system governance throughP4P implementation
Evaluating P4P programmes
Lessons from the case study P4P programmes
Part II Case studies of P4P programmes in OECD countriesPrimary care
Australia: Practice incentives programme
Estonia: Primary health care quality bonus system
France: Payment for public health objectives
Germany: Disease management programmes
New Zealand: Primary health organizationperformance programme
Turkey: Family medicine performance basedcontracting scheme
United Kingdom: Quality and outcomes framework
United States: California integrated healthcareassociation physician incentive programme
Inpatient care
Brazil: Sao Paulo: Social organizations in health
Republic of Korea: Value incentive programme
United States: Maryland hospital acquiredconditions programme
United States: Hospital quality incentivedemonstration
Index
List of contributors
Foreword from the OECD
Foreword from CNAMTS
Acknowledgements
List of abbreviations Part I An overview of health provider P4P in OECD countries
Health provider P4P and strategic healthpurchasing
P4P programme design
Strengthening health system governance throughP4P implementation
Evaluating P4P programmes
Lessons from the case study P4P programmes
Part II Case studies of P4P programmes in OECD countriesPrimary care
Australia: Practice incentives programme
Estonia: Primary health care quality bonus system
France: Payment for public health objectives
Germany: Disease management programmes
New Zealand: Primary health organizationperformance programme
Turkey: Family medicine performance basedcontracting scheme
United Kingdom: Quality and outcomes framework
United States: California integrated healthcareassociation physician incentive programme
Inpatient care
Brazil: Sao Paulo: Social organizations in health
Republic of Korea: Value incentive programme
United States: Maryland hospital acquiredconditions programme
United States: Hospital quality incentivedemonstration
Index