A Rich Bioethics

Reviews / Votes

"Adam Briggle has written a fine book on a complex, controversial topic. He shows the wisdom of the approach to bioethics taken by the Kass Council, sets right the unfair and often nasty attacks on the council and Kass himself, and offers a perceptive and wide-ranging look at the terrain of ethics." -Daniel Callahan, The Hastings Center

"Briggle had an inspired idea to make the controversies surrounding Leon Kass's chairmanship of the President's Council on Bioethics (2001-5) his point of departure to argue the need for bioethics based in humanistic questioning rather than accepting the more restricted task of what he calls instrumental bioethics, which exists to offer specific policy guidelines. The issues are clear throughout but perhaps best crystallized near the end of the book, when Briggle presents criticisms that the Kass Council failed to be sufficiently policy oriented." -Science and Public Policy

"In this book Dr. Briggle provides a sympathetic account of the President's Council on Bioethics led by Dr. Leon Kass. He shows the wisdom of the approach to bioethics taken by the Kass Council and corrects the unfair and often nasty attacks on the Council and Dr. Kass himself. It is a persuasive and thoughtful reconstruction of the Council's goals and rationale." -Law & Medicine

"The Kass council's reports, even more than Kass's own work, became, in Adam Briggle's words, 'a lightning rod for political controversy.' In particular, the council attracted criticism from many that its membership had been stacked to reflect Bush's own conservative views and that it was insufficiently attentive to the existence of disagreement among its own members. In his brief and breezy A Rich Bioethics, Briggle (a philosopher at the University of North Texas) sets out to give an account of the council's fundamental conception of bioethics and to evaluate its performance against that conception." -Science

"Anyone familiar with MacIntyre's narrative of decline and hoped-for renewal is likely to be struck by the similarities with this account of Adam Briggle's depiction of contemporary bioethics in A Rich Bioethics. In Briggle's view, bioethics is in disarray largely because it has succumbed to what he calls 'instrumentalism.' . . . there is much of value in Briggle's book. . . . it offers a model for public ethics committees that merits serious consideration." -Commonweal

"Briggle offers the first book-length analysis of the council's work, setting it in a wider philosophical, historical, and political context. The book also discusses how the procedure for selecting council members led to accusations that it was ideologically narrow. The book's well-balanced analysis and close but fair readings of the council's documents show how the Kass Council dealt with differences and was far more tolerant of varying opinions than many think. This book would be a useful supplementary text in classes on bioethics and public policy." -Choice

"A Rich Bioethics: Public Policy, Biotechnology, and the Kass Council . . . gives an account of the President's Council of Bioethics, led by Leon Kass from 2001-05, during President George W. Bush's administration." -Denton Record-Chronicle

"This is the most persuasive and thoughtful reconstruction of the Kass Council's goals and rationale that I have seen. Adam Briggle's account of the notion of a 'richer' bioethics is comprehensive and well-reasoned." -Jonathan D. Moreno, University of Pennsylvania

"What an eloquent, humane, and wise book. Briggle discovers an imperfect yet fascinating effort to bring the world of biomedical research into the domain of public philosophy. His scholarship and generosity make clear that a democratic society need not be morally shackled to the realm of the possible that science is constantly expanding." -Daniel Sarewitz, Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes, Arizona State University

"Adam Briggle has written a rich and sympathetic account of the President's Council on Bioethics led by Leon Kass. It puts in historical context the efforts of this council to move beyond the limited 'instrumentalist' approaches to bioethics taken by earlier commissions, toward a more philosophically serious effort to deliberate on the human goods put in play by modern biomedicine. In the process it answers many of the charges of politicization and corrects the record concerning the council's work." -Francis Fukuyama, The Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies