An Artificial History of Natural Intelligence

Reviews / Votes

"An impressive and important book. Readers will learn much from the author's sensitive and insightful readings of the scientific and philosophical literature . . . But that does not mean that it is only for academic readers. The topic is too important. . . . As David W. Bates shows, we cannot remove ourselves from the world of technology; it is our world. But we can try to guide its evolution to protect the things we value. This is something we all need to think about, and An Artificial History of Natural Intelligence provides essential tools for the task." * Times Literary Supplement * "In this book, the history of human versus artificial intelligence begins with such figures as Descartes, Leibniz, and other thinkers of the seventeenth-century who wondered if thought could be mechanized and how machines could be designed to mimic human thought. . . Then come nineteenth-century developments with Babbage, Lovelace, machines with 'memory,' and early studies of the brain when a reductionist biology enters the picture. . . . Drawing on Wittgenstein, Turing, and Leroi-Gourhan, among many others, the author discusses the 'immateriality' of thought, ideas form cybernetics, and recent interpretations of the mind-body problem." * Choice * "Historically astute and philosophically brilliant, this is the most ambitious, original, and important book on human-machine relations in thirty years. Bates surveys the entirety of the modern tradition since Descartes to demonstrate that there has never been a 'natural intelligence' to contrast with artificial intelligence and offers one convincing interpretation after another to force the reader to rework basic assumptions about technology, philosophy, and humanity. This is a tremendous achievement-intellectual history at its best." -- Stefanos Geroulanos, New York University "As new forms of artificial intelligence throw us into turmoil, Bates invites us to think through the ever-evolving relations between human and humanish. Deftly weaving together cognitive science, intellectual history, and philosophy, he shows that we have for centuries measured ourselves against our self-simulating machines and reasserted our existence in the gap between the natural world (which constitutes us) and the artificial (which we constitute). It is the perfect moment for this book." -- Jessica Riskin, Stanford University