
Prioritarianism
Richard J. Arneson(Author)
Cambridge University Press
Published on 2. June 2022
Book
Paperback/Softback
82 pages
978-1-108-73069-3 (ISBN)
Description
Prioritarianism holds that improvements in someone's life (gains in well-being) are morally more valuable, the worse off the person would otherwise be. The doctrine is impartial, holding that a gain in one person's life counts exactly the same as an identical gain in the life of anyone equally well off. If we have some duty of beneficence to make the world better, prioritarianism specifies the content of the duty. Unlike the utilitarian, the prioritarian holds that we should not only seek to increase human well-being, but also distribute it fairly across persons, by tilting in favor of the worse off. A variant version adds that we should also give priority to the morally deserving - to saints over scoundrels. The view is a standard for right choice of individual actions and public policies, offering a distinctive alternative to utilitarianism (maximize total well-being), sufficiency (make everyone's condition good enough) and egalitarianism (make everyone's condition the same).
More details
Series
Language
English
Place of publication
Cambridge
United Kingdom
Edition type
New edition
Product notice
Paperback (trade)
Illustrations
Worked examples or Exercises
Dimensions
Height: 229 mm
Width: 152 mm
Thickness: 4 mm
Weight
122 gr
ISBN-13
978-1-108-73069-3 (9781108730693)
Copyright in bibliographic data and cover images is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited or by the publishers or by their respective licensors: all rights reserved.
Schweitzer Classification
Other editions
Additional editions

Richard J. Arneson
Prioritarianism
E-Book
06/2022
Cambridge University Press
€15.49
Available for download
Richard J. Arneson
Prioritarianism
E-Book
05/2022
Cambridge University Press
€15.49
Available for download
Content
1. The Priority Idea; 2. Some Clarifications and Further Questions; 3. Priority for the Deserving; 4. Utilitarianism, Sufficiency, and Leximin; 5. Egalitarianism versus Prioritarianism.