The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence Studies

Reviews / Votes

This finely crafted volume explores ongoing efforts to bridge the gap between intelligence professionals and academics. Reflecting the contributors' diverse careers and national perspectives, these essays offer novel ways to improve intelligence research, teaching, and practice. The volume identifies new opportunities for collaboration, while showcasing some of today's most innovative thinkers in the field of intelligence studies. -- James J. Wirtz, U.S. Naval Postgraduate School The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence Studies, which displays a rich assortment of global academic and practitioner perspectives, confers the most comprehensive examination of the complexity surrounding the paradoxical-divergent while also symbiotic-relationship between professionals and scholars of intelligence, in their quest to develop intelligence as an academic discipline. -- Florina Cristiana Matei, Naval Postgraduate School The editors and authors have produced a unique and timely contribution. As the security environment becomes increasingly complex, bridging the academic-practitioner divide is becoming more necessary. This excellent volume skillfully identifies where the red lines and challenges are yet usefully shows how both academics and practitioners can work closer together to progress teaching and research excellence in the intelligence field. -- Patrick F. Walsh, Charles Sturt University, Editor, Australian Institute of Professional Intelligence Officers Journal, author of Intelligence and Intelligence Analysis Those who know don't speak; those who speak don't know.' Practitioners' traditional view of academic researchers is challenged by this diverse collection on comparative developments in Intelligence Studies. It shows how productive relationships can be enhanced while acknowledging correctly that the gap neither can nor should be eliminated entirely. -- Peter Gill, International Studies Association Distinguished Scholar