In Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India, by majority, struck down the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), established to appoint judges to the Supreme Court of India and High Courts. Unsurprisingly, the NJAC judgment has been the subject of a deeply polarized debate in the public sphere and academia. The essays in this volume analyse the NJAC judgment, and provide a rich context to it, in terms of philosophical, comparative, and constitutional issues that underpin it. The work traces the history of judicial appointments in India; analyses constitutional principles behind selecting judges and their application in the NJAC Case; and comparatively examines the judicial appointments process in six select countries-UK, South Africa, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Canada, and Nepal-enquiring into what makes a good judge and an effective appointments process.
Rezensionen / Stimmen
With 21 succinct essays on legal reasoning, Sengupta and Sharma's book is a marvelous read and should be used in courses on legal methods and argumentation. * Pooja Satyogi, Ambedkar University Delhi, newbooks.asia *
Sprache
Verlagsort
Zielgruppe
Für höhere Schule und Studium
Für Beruf und Forschung
Editions-Typ
Produkt-Hinweis
Fadenheftung
Gewebe-Einband
Maße
Höhe: 224 mm
Breite: 150 mm
Dicke: 28 mm
Gewicht
ISBN-13
978-0-19-948507-9 (9780199485079)
Copyright in bibliographic data and cover images is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited or by the publishers or by their respective licensors: all rights reserved.
Schweitzer Klassifikation
Arghya Sengupta is the founder of and research director at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, New Delhi.
Ritwika Sharma is a research fellow at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, New Delhi.
Herausgeber*in
Founder and Research DirectorFounder and Research Director, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, Delhi.
Research FellowResearch Fellow, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, Delhi.
Foreword by Justice Jasti Chelameswar
Introduction
PART I THE HISTORY OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS IN INDIA
I. From Kania to Sarkaria: Judical Appointments from 1950 to 1973
Suchindran B.N.
2. A Committed Judiciary: Indira Gandhi and Judicial Appointments
T.R. Andhyarujina
3. Recovering Lost Ground: The Case of the Curious Eighties
A.K. Ganguli
4. The Judicial Collegium: Issues, Controversies and the Road Ahead
Arun Jaitley
5. A Plague on Both Your Houses: NJAC and the Crisis of Trust
Pratap Bhanu Mehta
PART II THE ANALYSIS OF THE NJAC JUDGMENT
6. Judicial Review and Parliamentary Power: Reorienting the Balance
K.T. Thomas
7. Checks and Balances Revisited: The Role of the Executive in Judicial Appointments
Mukul Rohatgi
8. Opening up Appointments: Civil Society Participation in the NJAC
Madhavi Divan
9. The Obvious Foundation Test: Re-inventing the Basic Structure Doctrine
Raju Ramachandran and Mythili Vijay Kumar Thallam
10. Eight Fatal Flaws: The Failings of the National Judicial Appointments Commission
Arvind Datar
11. The Sole Route to an Independent Judiciary?: The Primacy of Judges in Appointment
Gautam Bhatia
12. Justice Lokur's Concurring View: The Future of Appointments Reform
Alok Prasanna Kumar
13. Justice Chelameswar's Dissent: Reforming to Preserve
Arghya Sengupta
14. The NJAC Case and Judicial Independence: Conceptual and Contextual Safeguards
Gopal Subramanium
PART III COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES
15. Comparative Law in the NJAC Judgment: A Missed Opportunity
Suhrith Parthasarathy
16. Judicialisation of Judicial Appointments?: A Response from the United Kingdom
Chintan Chandrachud
17. South Africa: Analysing a Commission Model
Chris McConnachie
18. Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada: Procedures and Controversies
Peter McCormick
19. Judicial Appointments in Pakistan: The Seminal Case of the 18th Amendment
Sameer Khosa
20. Judicial Appointments in Sri Lanka: A Politicised Trajectory
Rehan Abeyratne
21. Appointments to the Supreme Court of Nepal: A New Beginning
Semanta Dahal
Index
Abouth the Editors and Contributors
